Procedure of Choice
- 1 November 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Annals of Surgery
- Vol. 204 (5), 543-545
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-198611000-00006
Abstract
Operative gastrostomy (OG) for gastrointestinal decompression or feeding has stood the test of time. Nevertheless, this procedure is often associated with significant morbidity and occasional mortality. Furthermore, although it is often performed under local anesthesia, general anesthesia is frequently necessary. A recent alternative to OG is percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG). The purpose of this study is to describe our experience with 100 consecutive PEGs in 98 patients. There were no complications, and no patient died as a result of PEG. Furthermore, PEG never required general anesthesia and was rapid and less costly than OG. Since PEG is so simple to perform, it may be employed earlier in the patients''s course, thus avoiding nasogastric feedings or parenteral alimentation. PEG is the procedure of choice should gastrostomy be needed.This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- AN ANALYSIS OF THE ADVANTAGES OF STAMM AND PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY1986
- Techniques and ComplicationsAnnals of Surgery, 1985
- Percutaneous gastrostomyThe American Journal of Surgery, 1984
- PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY - A PREFERRED METHOD OF FEEDING TUBE GASTROSTOMY1984
- Percutaneous Endoscopic GastrostomyArchives of Surgery, 1983
- PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY - SIMPLIFIED ACCESS FOR ENTERAL NUTRITION1983
- Feeding gastrostomy: Complications and mortalityThe American Journal of Surgery, 1982
- A simplified technique for constructing a tube feeding gastrostomy.1981
- Gastrostomy without laparotomy: A percutaneous endoscopic techniqueJournal of Pediatric Surgery, 1980
- Feeding by tube enterostomy.1980