Potential inhibitors from wet oxidation of wheat straw and their effect on ethanol production of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Wet oxidation and fermentation by yeast
- 14 January 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Biotechnology & Bioengineering
- Vol. 81 (6), 738-747
- https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.10523
Abstract
Alkaline wet oxidation (WO) (using water, 6.5 g/L sodium carbonate and 12 bar oxygen at 195°C) was used as pretreatment method for wheat straw (60 g/L), resulting in a hydrolysate and a cellulosic solid fraction. The hydrolysate consisted of soluble hemicellulose (8 g/L), low-molecular-weight carboxylic acids (3.9 g/L), phenols (0.27 g/L = 1.7 mM) and 2-furoic acid (0.007 g/L). The wet oxidized wheat straw hydrolysate caused no inhibition of ethanol production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae ATCC 96581. Nine phenols and 2-furoic acid, identified to be present in the hydrolysate, were each tested in concentrations of 50–100 times the concentration found in the hydrolysate for their effect on fermentation by yeast. At these high concentrations (10 mM), 4-hydroxybenzaldehyde, vanillin, 4-hydroxyacetophenone and acetovanillone caused a 53–67% decrease in the volumetric ethanol productivity in S. cerevisiae compared to controls with an ethanol productivity of 3.8 g/L. The phenol acids (4-hydroxy, vanillic and syringic acid), 2-furoic acid, syringaldehyde and acetosyringone were less inhibitory, causing a 5–16% decrease in ethanol productivity. By adding the same aromatic compounds to hydrolysate (10 mM), it was shown that syringaldehyde and acetovanillone interacted negatively with hydrolysate components on the ethanol productivity. Fermentation in WO hydrolysate, that had been concentrated 6 times by freeze-drying, lasted 4 hours longer than in regular hydrolysate; however, the ethanol yield was the same. The longer fermentation time could not be explained by an inhibitory action of phenols alone, but was more likely caused by inhibitory interactions of phenols with carboxylic acids, such as acetic and formic acid. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Biotechnol Bioeng 81: 738–747, 2003.Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. II: inhibitors and mechanisms of inhibitionBioresource Technology, 2000
- Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. I: inhibition and detoxificationBioresource Technology, 2000
- Production of ethanol from wet oxidised wheat straw by Thermoanaerobacter mathraniiBioresource Technology, 1999
- Optimization of wet oxidation pretreatment of wheat strawBioresource Technology, 1998
- Pretreatment of wheat straw using combined wet oxidation and alkaline hydrolysis resulting in convertible cellulose and hemicelluloseBiotechnology & Bioengineering, 1996
- Measurement of the inhibitory potential and detoxification of biomass pretreatment hydrolysate for ethanol productionApplied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 1996
- Hydrothermal degradation of polymers derived from plantsProgress in Polymer Science, 1994
- Interaction of the effects of acetic acid and ethanol on inhibition of fermentation inSaccharomyces cerevisiaeBiotechnology Letters, 1989
- Identification of aromatic monomers in steam-exploded poplar and their influences on ethanol fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiaeJournal of Fermentation Technology, 1986
- Biomass pretreatment with water and high-pressure oxygen. The wet-oxidation processIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Product Research and Development, 1983