Evaluation of physical examination skills. Reliability of faculty observers and patient instructors
- 18 December 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 258 (23), 3405-3408
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.258.23.3405
Abstract
Effective teaching of physical examination skills requires an evaluation system that can identify trainees who need further instruction. To study the evaluation of physical examination skills by faculty observers and patient instructors, the reliability of their observation of medical students performing a general physical examination was measured. Faculty observers did not reliably evaluate 32% of examination skills. Faculty agreement was lowest when observing components of the head, neck, and abdominal examinations. Patient instructors, with limited faculty training, reliably evaluated 83% of those skills that were reliably assessed by the faculty. These findings demonstrate limitations in the current methods of evaluating performance and point out the need to examine systems of trainee assessment.This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Medical house staff performance in physical examinationArchives of Internal Medicine, 1986
- Initial instruction in the pelvic examination in the United States and Canada, 1983American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1985
- Detection and correction of house staff error in physical diagnosisJAMA, 1983
- Inter-observer error among surgeons and nurses in presymptomatic detection of breast diseaseJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1981
- The Reliability of Clinical Methods, Data and JudgmentsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1975
- The Reliability of Clinical Methods, Data and JudgmentsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1975
- OBSERVER VARIATION IN REPORTS ON ELECTROCARDIOGRAMSHeart, 1958