Impact of chromic catgut versus polyglactin 910 versus fast-absorbing polyglactin 910 sutures for perineal repair: A randomized, controlled trial
- 30 June 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Vol. 194 (6), 1585-1590
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2006.01.011
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Randomized Comparison of Chromic Versus Fast-Absorbing Polyglactin 910 for Postpartum Perineal RepairObstetrics & Gynecology, 2004
- A randomised trial, conducted by midwives, of perineal repairs comparing a polyglycolic suture material and chromic catgutMidwifery, 2002
- Continuous versus interrupted perineal repair with standard or rapidly absorbed sutures after spontaneous vaginal birth: a randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 2002
- The Ipswich Childbirth Study: 2. A randomised comparison of polyglactin 910 with chromic catgut for postpartum perineal repairBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1998
- The Southmead perineal suture study. A randomized comparison of suture materials and suturing techniques for repair of perineal traumaBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1989
- The short-form McGill pain questionnairePain, 1987
- West Berkshire perineal management trial.BMJ, 1984
- The McGill Pain Questionnaire: Major properties and scoring methodsPain, 1975