Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses Visual and refractive comparisons
- 1 March 1992
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
- Vol. 18 (2), 147-152
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0886-3350(13)80921-2
Abstract
In a unilateral prospective clinical trial, 77 cases were randomized to receive a 3M multifocal IOL or a conventional monofocal implant. Multifocal cases had better uncorrected near vision than monofocal cases at the two to four month visit. Thirty percent of the multifocal cases had near acuity J1, while only 4% of the monofocal cases had that acuity. Eighty-seven percent of multifocal cases and 71% of monofocal cases had near acuities of J1 to J3. With distance correction in place, 54% of multifocal cases had near acuities of J1 to J2, while only 28% of monofocal cases had comparable acuities (P = .04). There have been no serious postoperative complications in either group.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Multifocal intraocular lensesJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 1990
- New multifocal intraocular lens designJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 1990
- Prospective study of the new diffractive bifocal intraocular lensEye, 1989
- The First American Experience with the Multifocal Lens1Published by S. Karger AG ,1988
- Comparison of the SRK II™ formula and other second generation formulasJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 1988
- Clinical results of the multifocal lensJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 1987