Establishment of a UK-wide network to facilitate the acquisition of quality assured FDG–PET data for clinical trials in lymphoma
- 2 September 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Annals of Oncology
- Vol. 22 (3), 739-745
- https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdq428
Abstract
Background: Multicentre trials are required to determine how [fluorine-18]-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose–positron emission tomography imaging can guide cancer treatment. Consistency in quality control (QC), scan acquisition and reporting is mandatory for high-quality results, which are comparable across sites. Methods: A national positron emission tomography (PET) clinical trials network (CTN) has been set up with a ‘core laboratory’ to coordinate QC and interpret scans. The CTN is involved in trials in Hodgkin’s lymphoma [Randomised Phase III trial to determine the role of FDG-PET Imaging in Clinical Stages IA/IIA Hodgkin's Disease (RAPID) and Randomised Phase III trial to assess response adapted therapy using FDG-PET imaging in patients with newly diagnosed, advanced Hodgkin lymphoma (RATHL)] and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma [Blinded evaluation of prognostic value of FDG-PET after 2 cycles of chemotherapy in diffuse large B-cell Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma, a sub-study of the R-CHOP-21 vs R-CHOP-14 trial (R-CHOP PET substudy)]. Approval to join requires scanner validation and agreement to follow a standard QC protocol. Scans are transferred to the core laboratory and reported centrally according to predetermined criteria. Results: The qualification procedure was carried out on 15 scanners. All scanners were able to demonstrate the necessary quantitative accuracy, and following modification of image reconstruction where necessary, scanners demonstrated comparable recovery coefficients (RCs) indicating similar performance. The average RC (±1 standard deviation) was 0.56 ± 0.095 for the 13-mm sphere. Reports from 444 of 473 (94%) patients in RAPID and 67 of 73 (92%) patients in RATHL were available for randomisation of therapy. Conclusions: The CTN has enabled consistent quality assured PET results to be obtained from multiple centres in time for clinical decision making. The results of trials will be significantly strengthened by this system.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Qualification of PET Scanners for Use in Multicenter Cancer Clinical Trials: The American College of Radiology Imaging Network ExperienceJournal of Nuclear Medicine, 2009
- Prognostic Value of Interim 18F-FDG PET in Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: SUV-Based Assessment at 4 Cycles of ChemotherapyJournal of Nuclear Medicine, 2009
- The Netherlands protocol for standardisation and quantification of FDG whole body PET studies in multi-centre trialsEuropean Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2008
- Early 18F-FDG PET for Prediction of Prognosis in Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: SUV-Based Assessment Versus Visual AnalysisJournal of Nuclear Medicine, 2007
- Early Interim 2-[18F]Fluoro-2-Deoxy-D-Glucose Positron Emission Tomography Is Prognostically Superior to International Prognostic Score in Advanced-Stage Hodgkin's Lymphoma: A Report From a Joint Italian-Danish StudyJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2007
- Use of Positron Emission Tomography for Response Assessment of Lymphoma: Consensus of the Imaging Subcommittee of International Harmonization Project in LymphomaJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2007
- Use of FDG-PET to monitor response to chemotherapy and radiotherapy in patients with lymphomasEuropean Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2006
- FDG-PET after two cycles of chemotherapy predicts treatment failure and progression-free survival in Hodgkin lymphomaBlood, 2006
- FDG-PET after two to three cycles of chemotherapy predicts progression-free and overall survival in high-grade non-Hodgkin lymphomaAnnals of Oncology, 2005
- Does diabetes affect [18F]FDG standardised uptake values in lung cancer?European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2002