No-Fault Compensation for Medical Injury: A Case Study
Open Access
- 1 January 1995
- journal article
- Published by Health Affairs (Project Hope) in Health Affairs
- Vol. 14 (4), 164-179
- https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.14.4.164
Abstract
Changes in malpractice law remain an important goal of health care reform. Many state and federal legislators continue to call for measures that would limit the ability of injured patients to sue. There is also growing interest in alternatives to fault-based litigation. As legislators consider no-fault proposals, they can look to Florida's experience with the Neurological Injury Compensation Association (NICA), which for the past four years has been providing no-fault compensation for injured newborns. NICA provides some insights into the ways in which claims are generated, the nature of risk spreading, and the financial viability of a no-fault model.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Medical malpractice reformJournal of General Internal Medicine, 1995
- Practice Guidelines and Malpractice Litigation: A Two-Way StreetAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1995
- Bad “Bad Baby” BillsAmerican Journal of Law & Medicine, 1994
- Relation between Malpractice Claims and Adverse Events Due to NegligenceNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- New Ultrasound Evidence Appears to Link Prenatal Brain Damage, Cerebral PalsyPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1991
- Incidence of Adverse Events and Negligence in Hospitalized PatientsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Low Apgar scores and birth asphyxiaPostgraduate Medicine, 1988
- Medical MalpracticePublished by Harvard University Press ,1985