Differences in the corneal biomechanical effects of surface ablation compared with laser in situ keratomileusis using a microkeratome or femtosecond laser
- 1 December 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
- Vol. 34 (12), 2049-2056
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.08.021
Abstract
To compare the effects of different flap creation techniques on the biomechanical properties of the cornea in patients having myopic laser refractive surgery. UCLA Laser Refractive Center of the Jules Stein Eye Institute, Los Angeles, California, USA. In this retrospective case series, eyes that had myopic laser refractive surgery were categorized according to the type of flap creation: mechanical microkeratome (MK) LASIK (n = 32), femtosecond laser (FSL) LASIK (n = 32), or no flap creation (PRK) (n = 33). The preoperative central corneal thickness, intraoperative flap thickness, and planned ablation depth (AD),and the preoperative and postoperative manifest refraction spherical equivalent, corneal hysteresis (CH), and corneal resistance factor (CRF) were recorded. The mean change in CH (ΔCH) was 2.2 mm Hg, 1.9 mm Hg, and 2.3 mm Hg in the MK, FSL, and PRK groups, respectively. There were no significant differences in AD, ΔCH, or ΔCRF between the 3 groups. The correlation between AD and ΔCH was significant in all 3 groups. The correlation was strongest in the FSL group (r = 0.82, P<.0001) and weaker in the PRK group (r = 0.47, P = .006) and MK group (r = 0.46, P = .008). The biomechanical measures of CH and CRF decreased similarly after PRK and LASIK using laser or mechanical flap creation. However, LASIK using femtosecond laser flap creation caused a significantly more predictable change in corneal biomechanics, which correlated strongly with AD, than the change with PRK and LASIK with microkeratome flap creation.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Corneal hysteresis using the Reichert ocular response analyser: findings pre‐ and post‐LASIK and LASEKActa Ophthalmologica, 2008
- Measurement of corneal curvature change after mechanical laser in situ keratomileusis flap creation and femtosecond laser flap creationJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2008
- Risk Assessment for Ectasia after Corneal Refractive SurgeryOphthalmology, 2008
- Corneal biomechanical properties in normal, post-laser in situ keratomileusis, and keratoconic eyesJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2007
- Advances in refractive surgery: microkeratome and femtosecond laser flap creation in relation to safety, efficacy, predictability, and biomechanical stabilityCurrent Opinion in Opthalmology, 2006
- Corneal Ectasia After Laser In Situ Keratomileusis in Patients Without Apparent Preoperative Risk FactorsCornea, 2006
- Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzerJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2005
- Interferometric technique to measure biomechanical changes in the cornea induced by refractive surgeryJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2005
- Femtosecond laser versus mechanical keratome flaps in wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusisJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2005
- Progressive post-LASIK keratectasiaJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2002